There is something about cigarettes that puzzles me.
Why doesn't or why can't the government just ban the harmful ingredients that go into the cigarettes?
This may be a simplistic approach - to change what goes into the smokes, but it may offer a solution to many of the health problems associated with this addictive habit. I am astounded that with all the advertising that we see on t.v. and hear on the radio about quitting smoking there is very little discussion about the ingredients that are put into cigarettes.
After a very quick Google search on what is included in a cigarette, brings up many websites with pretty much the same information. Cigarettes have about 4000 ingredients other than tobacco. WTF? I think many of us have heard this statistic before, I know I have, so why or how can smoking companies still get away with this? Have governments gone completely mad to allow this to continue.
I have copied an extract from one website which has similar information as many other sites I've looked at, which lists some of the chemicals put into smokes.
Here are some other ingredients:
Acetone: nail polish remover
Ammonia: household cleaner
Angelica Root Extract: known to cause cancer in animals
Arsenic: used in rat poisons
Benzene: used in making dyes, synthetic rubber
Butane: gas; used in lighter fluid
Carbon monoxide: poisonous gas
Cadmium: used in batteries
Cyanide: deadly poison
DDT: a banned insecticide
Ethyl Furoate: causes liver damage in animals
Formaldehiyde: used to preserve dead specimens
Hydrazine: rocket fuel
Hydrogen Cyanide: rat poison
Lead: poisonous in high doses
Methoprene: insecticide
Megastigmatrienone: chemical naturally found in grapefruit juice
Maltitol: sweetener for diabetics
Methyl isocyanate: its accidental release killed 2000 people in Bhopal, India in 1984
Napthalene: ingredient in mothballs
Nicotine: a poison used to kill cockroaches
Polonium: cancer-causing radioactive element
With all the campaigning from Quit and varies other lobby groups against smoking, there is no mention about the ingredients. I really can't understand why it is not possible for a government to make it illegal to put many of the toxic and carcinogenic ingredients on a 'banned list'. It was done in the 1970's with asbestos in the building industry, and even though we still hear about cases of asbestoses and other forms of lung cancer caused by this product, it hasn't stopped us building, and the number of people dieing from this is reducing.
Maybe what I'm suggesting could be a change of approach which could satisfy the smokers who do not want to quit smoking and may help them to stop sucking in these harmful chemicals.
Can anyone tell me why harmful ingredients can't be banned?
Can the cigarette company justify poisoning people and continue to get away with it?
I would love see something happen on this regard, which would surely have a positive outcome.
Last night I watched the program Q and A on the ABC, where an audience member asked, 'Why can't we just ban cigarettes altogether?' I really can't see this ever happening. It would more likely take smoking underground, which for mine is not a clever solution. With what I'm suggesting the current laws on the sale of cigarettes would still be applicable so the government can still rake in the taxes.
Smokers could still throw away their money and buy smokes. Could it be a more natural cigarette? Would this encourage smoking if it wasn't as harmful? I don't know.
The cigarettes that we know now could change and maybe they might taste a bit different or may need to be re-lit more often? I wonder if smokers would be able to notice the difference and would accept any change to the smoke itself if they knew that they had less rubbish going through their body.
I'm not sure what could come of it, but it all seems ludicrous to continue with the status quo.
This is my rant, Adam and the Rants.